Jump to content

JD(OD)

Generals 1* - 3*
  • Content Count

    2,007
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

Everything posted by JD(OD)

  1. Re: the Jenkins vote. I can’t say whether it was removed or not. I’d have to dig through the logs. But the problem is the logs don’t capture data for failed promotions or voting etc… so if it was removed it was done by a General which I would see recorded in our Forum post tracking removal of votes/promotions. which means if not listed there and it was removed. then Jenkins deleted his vote and the promoter took it down after. —— no need to apologize. We all trip up now and then. I still have to start at January when counting out my months. Time in a
  2. This is actually not true. I can raise at least 2 instances where people have been neg voted and failed. 1 being JuJu. The other a warrant officer I can’t remember that was neg voted by Jenkins for not meeting their requirements due to not really being around if I recall correctly.
  3. For those of you who don't know. The discord team is no longer run just by @JD(OD). But instead has multiple leaders. Each leader oversees their "Projects" with members on their project team to assist. What are the roles? Project Manager: These are the Leaders of the Discord team and the Leader of the Project Team they are on. QA Tester: These are specialized members of a Project team. They are responsible for looking for bugs, updates etc... and testing features in our test servers prior to implementation on the live server among other things they
  4. 6/4/21 Modified Roles: All roles from 4* General-Enlisted have had the ability to post/create invites. Channel Edit: Permissions for 4* General - Enlisted have been given the ability to create invites for The Rules channel and only this channel. Reason Performed: To stop members from purposely/accidentally creating invites for members outside of The Rules channel so we can ensure all new members/guests land in the rules channel where they should be reading the rules prior to using our server. ---- Modified Roles: Roles 4* General - E
  5. I really honestly did not want to address this topic any further because we've already beaten this horse to death, buried, dug it up, stripped it for meat, re-buried the bones, and had a séance. But as my -15 on the recent promotion of @PureSkoomaOD keeps getting mentioned in passing in this posts. I'll go ahead and address this. --- Skooma, your concept you propose here is not exactly new. We've had people propose this idea in concept several times in the past and it always gets shot down. I don't recall the specifics of those posts. But they obviously did
  6. Right. But skooma is proposing a living document that’s updated as our leadership does. Which that section you posted is not.
  7. Like it. Love it. 10/10. @Blind wish to weigh in on the logistical side of implementing this to give others idea at whether it’s worth the efforts?
  8. Personally I disagree with keeping a "file" on these members. Members who are voting on one another need to do their research and make sure they are voting wisely. Asking the Admin team to maintain a living document that continues to grow for each members is asking way to much in my opinion. All of the information that members vote with is available for people to find if they're looking for it. It's just a matter of Commanders, Generals and all Officers etc... putting in the legwork to gather that information to make sure they're voting with an informed opinion.
  9. I don't really want to beat a horse to death on the topic. I've said my piece and then some on another topic and I'll partially quote/paraphrase myself on my stance for what's relevant here. All negative votes on either of the promotions Skooma/JuJu were crafted and supported with Constructive criticism. But that's also not the point. These opinions are based on careful gathering of information. None of these votes were done to slander either member and to simply keep them from Officer/Sr Officer. We voted they way we did because we thought they were not ready to make the next step
  10. If only Tris or Snowwhite were around.
  11. @MelodicRose(OD) and her team is actually working on sorting out inactive channels, squads, etc...
  12. To be fair and play devils advocate. Someone once created a squad for people to talk about and discuss music. I still don’t agree it needs to be a squad. But I’m just saying. I didn’t agree with that being a squad either.
  13. @Terra I've both updated this guide and submitted the Guide to the Generals Academy section. Creating MVP Channels - Generals - Overdosed Community Forums
  14. @Terra I will work on creating this guide in the template that I use for the Academy. No ETA. But I'll get it done.
  15. I agree with Zach. I don’t see any real reason to expand it to a squad as the channel is serving its purpose. Also @Zakspeeeed(OD) SOTM is reserved for squads pushing to become a division. If anything. I would argue we could make this a non squad if it called for it.
  16. Totally not forgotten. I’ll address this later once I’m on my pc. Mobile sucks.
  17. Badboi, I can't say I have any burning questions for you. You've been a solid commander even through out the crazy 2020 year. Maybe during your next yearly eval I'll have some questions for you 🙂
  18. 5/15/21 Added Roles: Enlisted(TC), Warrant Officer(TC) TC= Time Out Corner Reason Performed: A member posted a .mp4 video file that when played would crash your discord client. When attempted to terminate client/window. Your PC had the chance of crashing as well. These roles have had all but the ability to view channels, enter channels, chat/speak within channels as these members clearly posted this content maliciously so other members would be affected. The role will remain on the members until we can determine this was not the case no
  19. Blind, Since you join OD you've hit the ground running and haven't seemed to stop. You're running a division. You're rebuilding the website. You're apart of the Discord team. You play with other groups around the community. All while being Mr.Dad at home and carrying a job. I'm concerned that your blood is actually just coffee at this point. I think you take criticism well. I think you take direction well. I think you do a great job and listening to members and trying to solve the issues put in front of you by them. I could go on an on with ex
  20. Zak, You're a member that has had my support for a long time. You show good leadership skills and good judgement. When you're unsure of something you're not afraid to take a step back and ask questions to make sure you make the best call for yourself and for the division. You've done a wonderful job and building up Halo with the group of Officers you've moved up the ranks and mentored. Many of which who are doing amazing things themselves for not just Halo but the community as a whole. You do a good job at making sure that you're balancing IRL,OD Admin, an
  21. I just want to take a moment and clarify something that some may not be clear on. Zak is going up for 1* or Brigadier General. I have posted the Expectations linked in our guide to everything that was recently redone. Brig. Generals are specifically looked at as the Pillars of their Division and within the Community and are not exactly expected to be looked at to be branching out to the rest of the community just yet. This is something that if you look at the Sub heading for the Major and Lt. Generals you'll see they are more Community based where Brig. General is listed as follow
  22. Thank you for your support Rose. I can honestly say since building the team. I’ve created time for myself to game and do other things I’ve wanted to do without having to stress. I just now have to remember now that not everything has to be done as quick as I usually like them to be. This also is going to be an adjustment for members who are used to asking me for things and them being done with the swiftness. With tasks being properly delegated within the team. Some tasks are going to be done when they can or when the person has time. Rather then me jumping on my d
  23. @CompFreak(OD) and @Aerineth(OD) Thank you both for your support. I appreciate your evaluation and I understand that taking on a sometimes unhealthy load within OD to help out has always been my strength but my greatest weakness. Recently I've put measures into place to make sure I can both share that load and start delegating tasks. Ensuring that my balancing isn't thrown into chaos and I don't burn out. Thanks again for taking the time to post.
  24. Frank, Thanks for the support. I'll reach out if I have any further questions beyond what we discussed.
×
×
  • Create New...