Jump to content


Generals 1* - 3*
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


JD(OD) last won the day on June 4

JD(OD) had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

607 Perfect


About JD(OD)

  • Rank
    Your Friendly Neighborhood JD
  • Birthday 07/29/1991

Previous Fields

  • Country :
    United States
  • STEAM Contact Address
  • Xbox Live Gamertag

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests
    Fucking with Aerineth.

Contact Methods

  • Discord

Recent Profile Visitors

4,561 profile views
  1. Re: the Jenkins vote. I can’t say whether it was removed or not. I’d have to dig through the logs. But the problem is the logs don’t capture data for failed promotions or voting etc… so if it was removed it was done by a General which I would see recorded in our Forum post tracking removal of votes/promotions. which means if not listed there and it was removed. then Jenkins deleted his vote and the promoter took it down after. —— no need to apologize. We all trip up now and then. I still have to start at January when counting out my months. Time in a
  2. This is actually not true. I can raise at least 2 instances where people have been neg voted and failed. 1 being JuJu. The other a warrant officer I can’t remember that was neg voted by Jenkins for not meeting their requirements due to not really being around if I recall correctly.
  3. For those of you who don't know. The discord team is no longer run just by @JD(OD). But instead has multiple leaders. Each leader oversees their "Projects" with members on their project team to assist. What are the roles? Project Manager: These are the Leaders of the Discord team and the Leader of the Project Team they are on. QA Tester: These are specialized members of a Project team. They are responsible for looking for bugs, updates etc... and testing features in our test servers prior to implementation on the live server among other things they
  4. 6/4/21 Modified Roles: All roles from 4* General-Enlisted have had the ability to post/create invites. Channel Edit: Permissions for 4* General - Enlisted have been given the ability to create invites for The Rules channel and only this channel. Reason Performed: To stop members from purposely/accidentally creating invites for members outside of The Rules channel so we can ensure all new members/guests land in the rules channel where they should be reading the rules prior to using our server. ---- Modified Roles: Roles 4* General - E
  5. I really honestly did not want to address this topic any further because we've already beaten this horse to death, buried, dug it up, stripped it for meat, re-buried the bones, and had a séance. But as my -15 on the recent promotion of @PureSkoomaOD keeps getting mentioned in passing in this posts. I'll go ahead and address this. --- Skooma, your concept you propose here is not exactly new. We've had people propose this idea in concept several times in the past and it always gets shot down. I don't recall the specifics of those posts. But they obviously did
  6. Right. But skooma is proposing a living document that’s updated as our leadership does. Which that section you posted is not.
  7. Like it. Love it. 10/10. @Blind wish to weigh in on the logistical side of implementing this to give others idea at whether it’s worth the efforts?
  8. Personally I disagree with keeping a "file" on these members. Members who are voting on one another need to do their research and make sure they are voting wisely. Asking the Admin team to maintain a living document that continues to grow for each members is asking way to much in my opinion. All of the information that members vote with is available for people to find if they're looking for it. It's just a matter of Commanders, Generals and all Officers etc... putting in the legwork to gather that information to make sure they're voting with an informed opinion.
  9. I don't really want to beat a horse to death on the topic. I've said my piece and then some on another topic and I'll partially quote/paraphrase myself on my stance for what's relevant here. All negative votes on either of the promotions Skooma/JuJu were crafted and supported with Constructive criticism. But that's also not the point. These opinions are based on careful gathering of information. None of these votes were done to slander either member and to simply keep them from Officer/Sr Officer. We voted they way we did because we thought they were not ready to make the next step
  10. If only Tris or Snowwhite were around.
  11. @MelodicRose(OD) and her team is actually working on sorting out inactive channels, squads, etc...
  12. To be fair and play devils advocate. Someone once created a squad for people to talk about and discuss music. I still don’t agree it needs to be a squad. But I’m just saying. I didn’t agree with that being a squad either.
  13. @Terra I've both updated this guide and submitted the Guide to the Generals Academy section. Creating MVP Channels - Generals - Overdosed Community Forums
  14. @Terra I will work on creating this guide in the template that I use for the Academy. No ETA. But I'll get it done.
  15. I agree with Zach. I don’t see any real reason to expand it to a squad as the channel is serving its purpose. Also @Zakspeeeed(OD) SOTM is reserved for squads pushing to become a division. If anything. I would argue we could make this a non squad if it called for it.
  • Create New...